- 2013
- 2014
- 2015
- 2016
- 2017
- 2018
- 2019
- A Century of Acceleration
- Acknowledging State Terrorism
- Americans’ unfavorable attitudes toward Muslims since 9/11, by party affiliation
- Arab Spring
- Big Data and Mega Corpora in Middle East Studies
- CHHS-2019-02-19
- Confidentiality of Human Research Subjects, 1927
- Covid Disparities in the United States
- Crossword Cosmopolitanism
- Death Tolls of the Iran-Iraq War
- Forecasting
- From Brain Drain to Brain Flush
- International Education
- Introducing Powerblindness
- Making the United States Plural Again
- Middle East Studies at Carolina
- Nativism, Then and Now
- Online Catalogs and the Invisible Heritage of Arab Libraries
- Panopti-Claus
- President Oligarch
- Prosecuting Mass Destruction
- Racial Inequality in the United States
- Rightwing Postmodernists
- Syria’s Four Revolutions
- Syria’s Human Development Crisis
- Teaching Middle East Crises
- Ten Unfortunate Place-Names
- Thank You, Civil Society
- The Destruction of Syria
- The Disparaging Implications of Strategic Location
- The False Premise of Travel Ban 3.0
- The Man Who Broke the World
- The Meth Vote
- When Republicans Needed Muslim Allies
- Who Polices the Police?
- Women’s Assessments of Gender Equality
- #4 (no title)
- Bio/Contact
- Democracy Denied
- Iran
- Curriculum Vitae
- Islamic Parties
- Islamic Terrorism
- Liberal Islam
- Modernist Islam
- Teaching/Advising
- Muslim-American Terrorism
- The Missing Martyrs
- World Peace
Confidentiality of Human Research Subjects, 1927
When scratching out someone’s eyes constituted the protection of confidentiality…
“The faces were concealed in accord with the desire for anonymity expressed to us.”
– A.-M. Goichot, La vie féminine au Mzab (Paris: Librarie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, 1927), plat V.
Click on image for higher resolution:
August 31, 2018